Category: E.U.

Difficult to forecast what’s going to happen. Prorogation ? No-deal ? New deal ? Vote of no-confidence ? Referendum ? Revocation ? Nobody knows and we forget to think about the Brexit itself.

Why should the UK leave, according to the Leavers ? Because the country could be free of the EU constraint ? Because it could negotiate taxes and tariffs deals more interesting ? Because it would not have to accomodate undesired immigrants ? Because it could save the amount of its contribution to the EU budget ?

The Remainers have their answers to all these points. And try to show the advantages of not separating fron the EU. Outlining the danger of destroying the UK itself with the no-deal.

Who’s right ? Who’s wrong ? Who knows ?

I don’t hear many considerations on the reasons why the UK should be with the other European Countries. The purpose of the union. Aren’t we together to develop a peaceful European peaceful environment ? Aren’t we together to promote a humanitarian way of thinking ? The importance we attach to democracy, equality, gender respect, and so on ?

We are not together because we want to avoid the consequences of loleliness. We share a view of life. A culture. Hopes. My guess is that the UE is the expression of this unity. The idea is to live our ideas together. A mirage maybe.

The Brexit denies that beautiful idea.

I hope that Artcle 50 will be revoked, ultimately, because UK citizens will remember why we want to be together.

From the start, the Brexit is a crazy move. Rooted in anger, fear, lies and power quest. Forgetting hope, love, unity and peace.

To develop such a crazy project, a crazy leader is needed, and Boris Johnson should be that man. Especially now, since the only negotiated deal should not be accepted by the MPs. No deal is the only realistic prospect of the Brexit. And a politician has to be completely out of his mind to consider an event that will destroy both the UK and its economy.

I don’t see how the MPs could let Bojo achieve a no deal Brexit. But that man could prorogate the British Parliament, fundamental element of the country’s democracy, in order to preserve the democratic result of the 2016 referendum.

Of course, I hope that this will not happen. And that Article 50 will be revocated. Bojo could do that too.

I am not sure that anybody may know what’s going to happen. Nor Bojo himself. Theresa May tried to insufflate a dash of rationality in the Brexit non-sense. That was hopeless. Crazy Bojo shall perform a crazy decision nobody can forecast : that’s logical.

Whoever will be the new PM, he will have to deal with the necessity to get out of the Brexit deadlock. There are, apparently 3 ways to do that : the no-deal, a withdrawal deal, or revocation of Article 50.

A withdrawal deal has already been negotiated with the EU. It was not accepted by the Parliament. Those who believe that there may be another deal are out of their mind.

The real situation is that there are only two options. No-deal or revocation of Article 50.

I doubt that the Parliament will accept the no-deal. It’s not necessary to be very wise to forecast that this would deeply damage UK and endanger the union itself.

Thus, the only question left is how shall the next PM revocate Article 50. That could be done with a referendum. Or without it. Since UK is often said by ignorants to be the mother of democracy, the referendum could be used. Even though Bojo could revocate Article 50 without hyding himself behind citizens will. Even though Hunt ruled out the no-deal option.

That will be a funny show when the next PM will launch a new referendum to end with a Brexit they supported.

I hope that the end of Brexit shall not burry the questions it raised : why we are together, and what projects we should launch to strengthen our love.

To be continued…