The Independent outlined the lies that were offered to the British citizens on the 2016 Referendum. Both by Brexiters and by Remainers.
Now, I imagine that all this nonsense is known by the voters. And that they have a clear perspective of he 3 options left : Theresa May withdrawal agreement, no-deal or revocation of Article 50.
Today, they may choose with more information than ever. How can someone state that another Referendum would be undemocratic ?
I consider that the Referendum is not a democratic tool, since representatives are elected to take decisions on behalf of electors, having education, time and information to perform their duty. But if one considers that the first Referendum should bind the UK government, how is it possible to reject another Referendum when the knowledge of the outcome of ils result is better than it was in the first place ?
