Democracy

The Independent outlined the lies that were offered to the British citizens on the 2016 Referendum. Both by Brexiters and by Remainers.

Now, I imagine that all this nonsense is known by the voters. And that they have a clear perspective of he 3 options left : Theresa May withdrawal agreement, no-deal or revocation of Article 50.

Today, they may choose with more information than ever. How can someone state that another Referendum would be undemocratic ?

I consider that the Referendum is not a democratic tool, since representatives are elected to take decisions on behalf of electors, having education, time and information to perform their duty. But if one considers that the first Referendum should bind the UK government, how is it possible to reject another Referendum when the knowledge of the outcome of ils result is better than it was in the first place ?

Where are the European citizens ?

At this stage, it is difficult to know what will happen. Can anyone imagine what could happen? Apparently, the UK MPs do not have a clear idea of what they want. And they will have the final word, whatever Theresa May says.

Now, we look at the European leaders arguing about the length of the extension of Article 50 they will give to the UK, if they actually give any.

European citizens are sitting in front of that circus. We are maybe looking. And laughing. Or crying. Or wondering. In any case, we are spectators of our own history. What is going on will impact us. Since it will change the EU. And nobody talks about that.

What will happen if the UK does leave ? Apart from the economic and logistic questions that this will raise? What will happen if it has to stay to avoid a no deal? What will happen if there is another referendum in the UK and that the remain does have a majority? And if the Brexiters win a second time?

Apparently, it is impossible to guess what we want to happen tomorrow. Therefore, to talk about new month or next year. seems to be a joke. However, maybe we could better understand the decisions we have to take if we knew the future we want to build.

At this point, it’s obviously difficult to imagine that we could pretend the Brexit vote did not happen. It did. We have to accept that fact. If we pretend to deny it, then the UK could damage the EU badly. But we should have in mind right now that they will ask to come back. Sooner or later. Probably very soon. What are we going to answer to them? Will they have the same status and the same strange position they have always had within the EU? Will they have the possibility to stop or slow down the EU movements in the defense, social and fiscal areas?

If we knew where we want to go, it might be easier to know how we should behave in front of the Brexit.

How to get out of the deadlock?

The whole story is unbelievable right from the start.
Fear does lead to take some stupid decisions: with the Brexit, the UK is in danger. Its economy, its cultural links, its free open-minded spirit, its unity, its political system are challenged.

Since the Brexit vote, it appeared that there is no way to leave the EU without damages.

And the attitude of the MPs does reflect this. They are supposed to find a solution that does not exist.  Therefore they do repeat again and again that they don’t accept the withdrawal deal Theresa negotiated with Bruxelles. There is no good withdrawal deal possible.

Since the no deal would be a catastrophic conclusion, how come that the Article 50 revocation does not appear a sensible way to get out of the current deadlock?